简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

Airdrops, hard forks, staking, mining and NFTs

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

The Guide treats each of the common ways of acquiring tokens without payment.

Airdrops received for nothing are not income. Airdrops received in return for, or in expectation of, services (a marketing task, a referral, a "quest") are income from those services, valued at the time of receipt.1 The distinction tracks the general rule that a windfall is not income unless it is a reward for something the recipient did. A later disposal of airdropped tokens is taxed under the badges of trade with a cost base of nil for the free airdrop and the taxed value for the earned one.

Hard forks produce a second token for nothing. The Guide treats the receipt as a non-taxable windfall and taxes a later disposal only if the recipient is trading.2 The practical issue is cost allocation: whether part of the original token's cost should be allocated to the forked token. The Guide does not prescribe a method and IRAS will accept a reasonable, consistently applied approach. Allocating nil cost to the new token is conservative and avoids argument.

Mining is taxed on disposal of the mined tokens and not when they are mined. A company that mines is generally regarded as carrying on a business and is taxed on its profit from selling mined tokens, with mining expenses deductible from commencement. An individual who mines is treated as a hobbyist unless the mining is habitual and systematic, so an individual's gain on selling mined coins is not taxed and the losses are not deductible. Fees earned for providing mining or validation services to identifiable parties are taxable as service income.3 Singapore has little mining because of electricity cost, but the same analysis applies to validators and node operators. They are economically closer to service providers than to miners and should expect their block rewards and tips to be treated as service income once they operate at any scale.

Staking rewards are not treated separately in the Guide's original structure, and IRAS has approached them by analogy. Rewards earned by a holder who delegates to a validator are a return on the holding and income under section 10(1)(g) in the hands of a trader, while a long-term investor can argue that the rewards are an accretion to a capital asset. In practice IRAS has treated staking rewards received regularly as income regardless of the holder's status, by analogy to interest or to dividends in kind, valued at receipt.4 On this point the Swiss position, which taxes staking rewards as income from movable property for every private holder (Part G, Chapter II), is at least clear, whereas the Singapore position still carries a measure of uncertainty for the passive investor.

Non-fungible tokens follow the same logic as any other asset. A creator who mints and sells NFTs is carrying on a trade or vocation and is taxed on the proceeds. A collector who buys and later sells an NFT is taxed only if the badges of trade point to trading. Royalties programmed into the NFT contract and paid to the creator on secondary sales are income under section 10(1)(f) or (g). Singapore's Finance Minister confirmed in March 2022 that NFT income is taxed under the normal rules and that there is no separate regime.5

Notes

  1. IRAS, e-Tax Guide Income Tax Treatment of Digital Tokens, second edition, 30 January 2026, paragraphs on airdrops (free airdrops not income; airdrops for services taxable). ↩
  2. IRAS, e-Tax Guide Income Tax Treatment of Digital Tokens, second edition, 30 January 2026, paragraph on hard forks (windfall on receipt; disposal taxed if trading). ↩
  3. IRAS, e-Tax Guide Income Tax Treatment of Digital Tokens, second edition, 30 January 2026, section on mining (tax on disposal; companies taxed on profits; individuals presumed hobbyists; service fees taxable). ↩
  4. IRAS, e-Tax Guide Income Tax Treatment of Digital Tokens, second edition, 30 January 2026, and IRAS website guidance on digital tokens for individuals. ↩
  5. Parliamentary reply of the Minister for Finance, Singapore Parliament, 11 March 2022, on the tax treatment of NFT transactions. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. As a Singapore law practice, KGP Legal LLC is authorised under the Legal Profession Act 1966 to advise on Singapore law and to represent clients before the Singapore courts; foreign law practices with an office in Singapore are, as a rule, not permitted to do either. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.