简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

White-Collar Crime and Corporate Liability

White-Collar Crime and Corporate Liability

Singapore pursues dishonesty and market misconduct under general statutes. The articles collected here explain cheating, criminal breach of trust, fraud under section 424A of the Penal Code 1871, computer misuse, money laundering under the 1992 Act, unlicensed activity, market misconduct and corporate and officer liability. They also describe the enforcement agencies and how an investigation actually runs. The cases concern tokens, and the offences are general.

The statutes

Singapore has no digital-asset criminal statute. The Penal Code 1871 supplies the dishonesty offences, with a standalone offence of fraud since 2020. The Computer Misuse Act 1993 covers unauthorised access. The Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 supplies the laundering offences and the confiscation machinery.

Part 12 of the Securities and Futures Act 2001 prohibits false trading, market manipulation, misleading statements and insider trading.

Companies and their officers

An officer who consented to or connived in a company's offence can be liable alongside the company under the regulatory statutes. Internal controls and a clear response plan therefore matter to the people at the top.

Where money has been lost, the book explains the civil tools in its sections on the interim toolkit and on the first hours of tracing, together with the agencies that investigate.

In this section

Start with the statutory architecture, corporate and officer liability or the map of enforcement.

Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Enforcement: Corporate Liability, Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Cross-Border Cooperation

On 24 April 2026 the High Court of Singapore approved the first deferred prosecution agreement, between the Public Prosecutor and Seatrium Limited. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Corporate criminal liability

Singapore’s criminal law does not contain a general provision dedicated to the criminal liability of companies. It reaches companies through definitions. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Deferred prosecution agreements

Singapore’s first major resolution with a company for foreign bribery came before the deferred prosecution regime was available. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Mutual legal assistance and extradition

The Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 2000 (MACMA) is the principal statute for cooperation with foreign prosecutors. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Asset recovery and confiscation

The CDSA allows the court, on the application of the Public Prosecutor, to make confiscation orders against persons convicted of drug dealing or serious offences. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Parallel proceedings in several jurisdictions

The Keppel case of 2017 is Singapore’s leading example of a coordinated resolution with several states. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Enforcement: Corporate Liability, Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Cross-Border Cooperation: practical consequences

For a company based in Singapore, the main lesson of the Keppel and Seatrium cases is that self-reporting and cooperation determine the outcome. Both companies received a non-trial resolution. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Comparison with Geneva and other centres

Switzerland introduced corporate criminal liability on 1 October 2003 through what is now Article 102 of the Criminal Code. The Swiss rule is narrower and more specific than the Singapore approach. Read more
Singapore · Trade Finance and Risk

Enforcement: Corporate Liability, Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Cross-Border Cooperation: summary

Singapore law treats companies as persons capable of committing almost any offence and attributes to them the conduct of directors, employees and agents. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Singapore VI: Enforcement, Insolvency and Dispute Resolution

The five preceding Singapore parts describe how digital assets are owned, licensed, taxed and kept clean. This part describes what happens when something goes wrong. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

The statutory architecture

Singapore has no digital-asset criminal statute. Offences involving tokens are prosecuted under general legislation drafted for other purposes and read, with some strain, onto a new asset class. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Cheating

Cheating under s 415 requires deception of a person and inducement by that deception, followed either by a dishonest or fraudulent delivery of property or by a damaging act or omission of the person… Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Criminal breach of trust and misappropriation

Criminal breach of trust under s 405 requires that a person was entrusted with property or with dominion over it. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Fraud under section 424A

The Criminal Law Reform Act 2019 introduced s 424A, modelled on the English Fraud Act 2006, in force from 1 January 2020. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Computer misuse

The Computer Misuse Act 1993 criminalises unauthorised access to computer material (s 3), access with intent to commit an offence (s 4) and unauthorised modification (s 5). Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Money laundering under the CDSA

Part 6 of the CDSA contains the laundering offences. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Unlicensed activity

Section 5 of the Payment Services Act 2019 prohibits carrying on a business of providing any type of payment service in Singapore without a licence or exemption. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Market misconduct

Part 12 of the Securities and Futures Act prohibits false trading and market rigging (s 197), market manipulation (s 198) and false or misleading statements (s 199). Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Corporate and officer liability

Singapore statutes use a consistent technique for attributing offences to companies and their officers. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Four cases that shaped Singapore practice

Terraform Labs Pte Ltd was a Singapore company. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Comparative summary

The table shows a system that punishes dishonesty more heavily than Switzerland and that reaches negligent participation in laundering, which Swiss law leaves to administrative sanction. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

The map of enforcement

A Swiss lawyer accustomed to cantonal prosecutors, a federal Office of the Attorney General with a defined catalogue of competences and a separate FINMA enforcement division will find Singapore's… Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

The Commercial Affairs Department

CAD is the principal white-collar crime investigation agency. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

The Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office

STRO receives the suspicious transaction reports that the CDSA requires of every person in the course of business, together with cash movement reports and cash transaction reports. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

MAS Enforcement

CPIB reports directly to the Prime Minister's Office and investigates offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960. Its relevance to digital assets is narrow but real. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

The Anti-Scam Command and retail fraud

The great majority of crypto-related police reports in Singapore are retail scams. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Investigating agencies: the Attorney-General's Chambers

AGC's Crime Division prosecutes, its Financial and Technology Crime Division handles complex commercial cases and its International Affairs Division is the central authority for mutual legal… Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Mutual legal assistance

The Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 2000 (MACMA) governs Singapore's incoming and outgoing requests. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

How a crypto investigation actually runs

A typical CAD investigation into a collapsed platform begins with a report, often from a creditor, followed by a request for documents to the company and its officers. Read more
Singapore · Enforcement

Investigating agencies: Comparative observations

Three differences between the Swiss and Singapore investigative systems have practical consequences for structuring. Read more