Assessment
Part 9 is the clearest statement of Singapore's policy on digital assets since the 2022 collapses. The regime does not seek to attract firms. It seeks to ensure that no firm can use Singapore as a flag of convenience for activity that MAS cannot supervise. In the Swiss comparison it has no counterpart. A Swiss AG that provides crypto services exclusively to foreign customers is a financial intermediary under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA; GwG) and must affiliate to an SRO. There is no Swiss prohibition on serving foreign customers from Switzerland and no suggestion that FINMA would refuse to supervise such a firm (see Part F, Chapter II). Switzerland regulates the firm because it is there. Singapore, under Part 9, tells the firm to go elsewhere unless it also serves Singapore.
For a founder deciding between the two hubs, the lesson is direct. If the business is global and does not need Singapore customers, the Singapore entity should hold no customer relationships and no assets, or should not exist. If the business wants Asian customers including Singapore residents, the Payment Services Act licence is the route, with all that Chapters II and III entail. If the business wants a regulated European or Swiss base for global customers, Switzerland remains open in a way that Singapore has chosen not to be.
| Question | Switzerland | Singapore |
|---|---|---|
| Firm incorporated locally, customers all abroad | Lawful; SRO affiliation under AMLA required for exchange or custody | Part 9 FSMA licence required; MAS will generally refuse; cease or restructure |
| Firm licensed locally, customers at home and abroad | Lawful under SRO/FinIA/BankA licence | Lawful under PSA/SFA licence; exempt from Part 9 |
| Letterbox entity with no local operations | Possible but SRO will require a Swiss AML officer | Caught by Part 9 by incorporation alone |
| Individual employee of foreign firm working locally | No licence issue for the individual | No Part 9 licence by employment alone; employer may trigger main Acts |
| Policy stance | Regulate what is here | Regulate what serves Singapore; discourage the rest |
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.