Custody agreement review
Read the PDF edition (2 pages)
Whether the client is placing assets with a custodian or acting as one, the custody agreement decides the insolvency outcome analysed in the sixth decision guide. The review checklist is the practical companion to that guide. It is written from the depositor's side. A custodian reviewing its own terms reads it in reverse.1
Checklist
- Nature of the obligation: does the custodian undertake to keep the specific assets, or an equivalent quantity, available at all times? Any right to use, lend, stake, pledge or rehypothecate defeats segregation.
- Wallet structure: individually allocated addresses or omnibus; if omnibus, how the client's share is recorded and how often reconciled.
- Statement of the legal characterisation: Swiss agreement should reference Art. 242a DEBA and the custodian's undertaking; Singapore agreement should declare the trust and define the beneficial interest as a proportionate share of each asset pool.
- Treatment of forks, airdrops and staking rewards: who receives them, who decides whether to support a fork, and in what time.
- Key management: who holds keys, multi-signature or MPC arrangements, geographic distribution, disaster recovery, and whether the client can verify holdings on-chain.
- Instructions: authorised signatories, authentication, cut-off times, the custodian's right to refuse, and the liability for executed fraudulent instructions.
- Fees and liens: whether the custodian has a lien or set-off right over client assets, which can convert a segregable asset into security for the custodian's claims.
- Liability: standard of care, exclusions, caps, insurance and the cover actually in place (specie or crime insurance, limits, exclusions for hot wallets).
- Sub-custody: whether permitted, who the sub-custodians are, and whether the client's rights survive the sub-custodian's insolvency.
- Reporting: statements, auditor's assurance reports on segregation, access to reconciliation records.
- Termination: notice periods, the delivery procedure on termination, and the time within which assets must be returned.
- Governing law and forum: a Swiss custodian under Swiss law, a Singapore custodian under Singapore law; avoid a third law that neither insolvency court will apply to the segregation question.
- Regulatory status warranties: licence or SRO membership, notification of change of status, and the consequence of loss of licence.
- Confidentiality and data: who may access client data, including blockchain analytics providers and group entities abroad.
Notes
- DEBA Art. 242a and 242b; Payment Services Regulations 2019 as amended in 2024; the custody agreement under Swiss law is analysed in Part D, Chapter IV and under Singapore law in Part J, Chapter II. ↩
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.