Due process and judicial review
Read the PDF edition (2 pages)
MAS enforcement is administrative, so the safeguards are those of administrative law. For composition the licensee consents, so no appeal exists, but the licensee can refuse composition and take its chances in a prosecution, which few do. For prohibition orders and revocations MAS must give written notice of the proposed action and the grounds, allow representations within a stated period, and give a reasoned decision, with an appeal to the Minister whose decision is final. Judicial review of MAS decisions is available in principle on the grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety, but the Singapore courts give financial regulators wide latitude and no digital-asset enforcement decision has been successfully reviewed.1
The comparison with FINMA is instructive. FINMA enforcement decisions are subject to appeal to the Federal Administrative Court and then to the Federal Supreme Court, which review law and fact. FINMA's "naming" practice under Art. 34 FINMASA is a separate sanction requiring a serious violation (see Part H, Chapter IV). MAS publishes its sanctions as a matter of routine, with no separate threshold. A Swiss firm accustomed to litigating against FINMA will find that the Singapore route offers fewer opportunities and that the realistic strategy is negotiation before the decision is made.
| Sanction | MAS | FINMA |
|---|---|---|
| Private warning | Supervisory warning | Supervisory letter, Rüge |
| Public censure | Reprimand (published) | Feststellungsverfügung; publication under Art. 34 FINMASA only for serious violation |
| Monetary | Composition (admin.), civil penalty (court) | No fining power; disgorgement Art. 35 FINMASA |
| Individual ban | Prohibition order under FSMA, up to life | Industry ban Art. 33 FINMASA, up to 5 years; activity ban Art. 33a |
| Licence | Revocation, suspension, conditions, directions | Licence withdrawal Art. 37, liquidation |
| Appeal | Representations, Minister; judicial review | Federal Administrative Court, Federal Supreme Court |
| Criminal referral | CAD / AGC; joint investigations | Federal Department of Finance (FINMASA offences); OAG for SCC offences |
| Publication | Routine | Only on legal basis and proportionality |
Notes
- Financial Services and Markets Act 2022, Part 3, procedure for prohibition orders and appeals to the Minister; Payment Services Act 2019, s 11(4)–(6) on notice and representations before revocation. ↩
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.