简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português

Enforcement reality

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

Neither regulator has brought an enforcement action against a DeFi protocol as such. Both have acted against identifiable operators. FINMA has issued cease-and-desist orders and liquidated companies that operated front-ends and held keys while describing themselves as decentralised.1 MAS has refused licences and issued warnings to Singapore-based teams. In the United States, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's 2023 action against the Ooki DAO and the Department of Justice's 2024 prosecution of the Tornado Cash developers have shown that governance token holders and developers can be reached. Both Swiss and Singapore regulators follow those developments closely.2 A client who relies on decentralisation as a shield should be told that the shield holds only if the facts of control support it. Those facts will be examined by a prosecutor with access to the chain, the code repository and the governance forum.

Notes

  1. FINMA enforcement practice is recorded in its annual Enforcement Reports (2021–2025); individual cases involving purported DeFi operators are discussed in Part E, Chapter IX and Part H, Chapter IV. ↩
  2. CFTC v Ooki DAO, N.D. Cal., default judgment of 8 June 2023 (DAO held liable as an unincorporated association); United States v Roman Storm, S.D.N.Y., indictment unsealed 23 August 2023. Part H, Chapter I compares the Swiss criminal-law position. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For Hong Kong, our parallel site HongkongIQ.com offers the same practical guidance. For crypto and digital assets, dltreg.com covers legal, tax and fiduciary services. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.