Hong Kong and Singapore compared
Read the PDF edition (2 pages)
The following table sets the two Asian hubs side by side as at 30 June 2026, with Switzerland in a third column where the comparison helps.
| Question | Hong Kong | Singapore | Switzerland |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulator | SFC (platforms, intermediaries, funds); HKMA (banks, stablecoins) | MAS (integrated) | FINMA; SROs; SNB |
| Exchange licence | AMLO Part 5B VATP licence plus SFO Types 1 and 7 for security tokens | PSA DPT licence (SPI/MPI); RMO for securities | SRO; fintech/bank licence if deposits; DLT trading facility for securities |
| Retail access | Permitted on licensed platforms; large-cap tokens only; knowledge test | Permitted with restrictions on incentives, credit, staking, marketing | No retail-specific rules |
| Custody | Associated entity on trust; 98 % cold; compensation arrangement | Statutory trust; majority cold; daily reconciliation | Art. 242a DEBA segregation |
| Stablecoins | Stablecoins Ordinance in force 1 August 2025; HKMA licence; HK$ 25 million capital | SCS framework (2023); legislation pending | Deposit or CISA characterisation; FINMA Guidance 06/2024 |
| Staking for retail | Permitted via licensed VATPs since April 2025 | Barred | Unregulated (deposit question for custodial staking) |
| Spot crypto ETFs | Authorised since April 2024 | Not authorised for retail | ETPs on SIX since 2018 |
| Offshore-serving businesses | Not captured unless marketing to Hong Kong | Captured by FSMA Part 9 since 30 June 2025 | Captured if operated from Switzerland |
| Capital gains tax | None | None | None for private individuals; wealth tax applies |
| Profits/corporate tax | 16.5 % | 17 % | Approx. 12 % (Zug) to 20 % (Zürich) |
| GST/VAT on token trades | No GST | GST-exempt | VAT-exempt |
| Property characterisation | Re Gatecoin (2023) | ByBit (2023) | Factual power of disposal; ledger-based securities |
| Mainland China access | Gateway; e-CNY and mBridge; Stock Connect model | None specific | None |
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.