How each standard lands: the implementation map
Read the PDF edition (2 pages)
| Standard | Date | Swiss landing | Singapore landing | Open at 30 June 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATF R.15 and INR 15 (VASPs, travel rule) | October 2018; June 2019; guidance October 2021 | Art. 2 para. 3 AMLA; AMLO-FINMA Art. 10 and 51a; FINMA Guidance 02/2019; SRO rules | PSA 2019 and 2021 amendments; MAS Notice PSN02; FSMA Part 9 (DTSP) | Fifth-round mutual evaluations; DeFi "control" test; unhosted wallets |
| FSB global framework | 17 July 2023 | Federal Council stablecoin work; FINMA Guidance 06/2024 | MAS SCS framework (August 2023); 2023 segregation rules | FSB peer review follow-up; multi-function intermediaries in Switzerland |
| BCBS SCO60 | 16 December 2022; amended 17 July 2024 | CAO revision and FINMA circulars (Basel III final) | MAS Notice 637 amendments | Confirmation of implementation dates; infrastructure add-on |
| IOSCO recommendations | 16 November 2023 (crypto); December 2023 (DeFi) | FinMIA DLT trading facility rules for securities only | MAS 2023 customer-protection measures; PS-G03 | Conflicts rules for non-security tokens in Switzerland |
| OECD CARF and amended CRS | October 2022; MCAA November 2023 | AEOI Act amendments in force 1 January 2026; partner-state decree suspended November 2025; data collection from 2027 at the earliest, first exchange 2028 | ITA Part 20B regulations; first exchanges 2027 or 2028 | Swiss partner-state list; Singapore regulations; Union DAC8 recognition |
Two observations close the chapter. First, Singapore's implementations are statutory and dated, Switzerland's are often administrative and derived from existing law. That difference reflects the two legal traditions discussed in Chapter I and explains why a Singapore compliance officer can point to a notice paragraph while a Swiss one points to a FINMA practice. Second, the standards converge. The FATF's VASP, MiCA's CASP, Singapore's DPT service provider, the OECD's RCASP and the FSB's crypto-asset service provider describe the same business from four angles. A firm that designs its compliance architecture around the FATF definition and the CARF reporting unit will find that the other regimes map onto it with small adjustments, which is the design principle Part P, Chapter IV, applies to the dual-hub group.
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.