简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

Interaction with the Payment Services Act and the SFA

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

The three statutes form a hierarchy. The Payment Services Act and the SFA are the main Acts and apply to services provided in Singapore or to persons in Singapore. Part 9 of the FSMA is residual and applies only to Singapore-connected providers whose services are provided outside Singapore and who are not licensed or exempt under a main Act for the same activity. The exemption in Part 9 for persons licensed or exempt under a main Act prevents double licensing.1 A Singapore MPI that deals in DPTs for Singapore and foreign customers is governed by the Payment Services Act for all of them. A Singapore CMS licensee that deals in tokenised securities for foreign institutional clients is governed by the SFA.

The hierarchy produces one anomaly. A Singapore company that wants to serve foreign customers can obtain a Payment Services Act licence only if it also provides a payment service "in Singapore". MAS has read that phrase as requiring a Singapore customer base or a Singapore place of business from which the service is provided to Singapore persons. A company with no Singapore customers at all cannot apply under the Payment Services Act and must apply under Part 9, where MAS will almost certainly refuse. The route out is to build a Singapore customer base, which brings the consumer protection measures of Chapter III into play, or to leave. MAS appears to regard this result as intended: Singapore wants crypto firms that serve Singapore under Singapore rules and does not want to lend its name to firms that serve others.

Notes

  1. Allen & Gledhill, 10 June 2025 (above): the Part 9 licensing requirement does not apply to a person providing a digital token service that must be licensed under the SFA, FAA or PSA or that is exempted from those Acts, or to a service specified in the Second Schedule to the FSMA. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.