简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

Private credit and receivables

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

Tokenised private credit, in which loans to businesses are originated, funded and serviced through tokens, grew rapidly in 2024 and 2025 through protocols such as Centrifuge, Maple and Goldfinch and through institutional platforms. The token represents a participation in a loan or a pool of loans. The borrower is an identifiable company that has signed a loan agreement under some governing law. The lenders are token holders who may be pseudonymous.

The legal structure under both Swiss and Singapore law is a loan participation or a securitisation. If the token represents a direct claim against the borrower, the borrower has issued a debt security and the FinSA prospectus regime or the SFA debenture regime applies. If the token represents a share in a pool managed by a platform, the pool is a collective investment. If the platform holds the loan and passes through the cash flows, the token is a claim against the platform. The author has seen all three described as "tokenised private credit" in a single offering document, so the first task is to establish which the client has built. The enforcement question, which asks how pseudonymous token holders enforce a loan against a defaulting borrower, is usually answered by appointing a security agent or trustee who holds the loan and acts for the holders. That agent is a financial intermediary under the AMLA and is likely to need a licence in Singapore.

Singapore perspective

A Singapore VCC that wants to hold tokenised real-world assets in a sub-fund can do so, provided its custodian can custody the tokens, its administrator can value them and its auditor can verify the link between token and underlying. In practice this confines the VCC to tokens issued by regulated institutions with published reconciliation processes. For the VCC's own units, the fund may issue tokenised units through a registrar that treats the token as a transfer instruction, as the Project Guardian funds have done, but the register of members under the Variable Capital Companies Act 2018 remains the authoritative record. Part M, Chapter IV and Part P, Chapter VI treat the fund structuring and tax.

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.