简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português

Private law and the courts

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

Hong Kong's courts reached the property question at the same time as Singapore's. In Re Gatecoin Ltd the Court of First Instance held in 2023 that cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, applying the Ainsworth indicia and following the Singapore and New Zealand authorities. On the facts, however, the court found that the exchange's later terms of service had turned the relationship into a debtor-creditor one, so that most customers ranked as unsecured creditors.1 The decision has become the standard citation in Hong Kong and is persuasive in Singapore, where ByBit reached the same property conclusion. Its second holding carries the warning that Part J, Chapter V, repeats for Singapore: the customer's position depends on the terms, so that an exchange which changes its terms can turn beneficiaries into creditors with a click.

For enforcement, Hong Kong offers the common-law toolkit that Singapore offers: proprietary and Mareva injunctions, Norwich Pharmacal and Bankers Trust orders against exchanges and, since 2022, service by NFT on persons unknown. The courts are experienced in cross-border fraud and have treated crypto cases as a variant of the trade-finance and investment frauds they have handled for decades. The author's practice has used Hong Kong disclosure orders against exchanges in parallel with Singapore proceedings and Swiss criminal complaints in the same fraud. The three systems cooperate better than their formal mutual-assistance channels would suggest, because the exchanges themselves hold the information and respond to a court order from any respected jurisdiction.

Notes

  1. Re Gatecoin Ltd [2023] HKCFI 914, Linda Chan J, at [45] to [62] on the property question and at [70] ff. on the trust analysis of the successive terms of service. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For Hong Kong, our parallel site HongkongIQ.com offers the same practical guidance. For crypto and digital assets, dltreg.com covers legal, tax and fiduciary services. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.