简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português

Reverse solicitation

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

The only route by which a non-Union firm may serve a Union client without authorisation is Art. 61, the reverse-solicitation exemption. Where a client established in the Union initiates at its own exclusive initiative the provision of a service by a third-country firm, the authorisation requirement does not apply to that service. The exemption does not permit the firm to market new types of crypto-assets or services to that client. ESMA's guidelines, adopted after a December 2024 final report, read the exemption narrowly. Any form of solicitation, promotion or advertising directed at the Union excludes it, whether done by the firm or by a third party on its behalf, through sponsorship, influencers, apps available in Union app stores or websites in Union languages.1

The practical consequence for a Zug or Singapore exchange is that reverse solicitation is a defence for individual relationships, never a business model. A firm with a thousand Union customers acquired through a product that is visible in the Union will not succeed in showing that each of them came at its own exclusive initiative. The sensible course is to geo-block, to turn off Union-language marketing and to document any remaining Union client's initiative, or to set up the Union subsidiary. Swiss firms know the pattern from the FinSA client-adviser register and the cross-border rules of the Union's MiFID regime. Singapore firms know it from the mirror image: MAS's FSMA Part 9 regime treats the Singapore base of an overseas-serving business as the licensing trigger, which is the same logic in the opposite direction.

Notes

  1. Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, Art. 61. ESMA, Final Report on Guidelines on reverse solicitation under MiCA, 17 December 2024 (ESMA35-1872330276-1899). The guidelines treat the exemption as a narrow exception that cannot be used to circumvent MiCA. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For Hong Kong, our parallel site HongkongIQ.com offers the same practical guidance. For crypto and digital assets, dltreg.com covers legal, tax and fiduciary services. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.