The eighteen months that made the law
Between July 2022 and the end of 2023 the General Division of the High Court, in almost every case through Aedit Abdullah J, dealt with five digital-asset insolvencies. They concerned a crypto lender (Vauld, through its Singapore entity Defi Payments Pte Ltd), a crypto exchange group (Zipmex), a yield platform (Hodlnaut), a hedge fund (Three Arrows Capital) and a crypto lending and asset-management group (Babel Finance). The cases arose from a single cause, the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022 and the cascading failures that followed. Together they tested every tool in the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (IRDA): the scheme moratorium under s 64, judicial management, winding up, the recognition of foreign proceedings under the UNCITRAL Model Law and the scheme of arrangement itself. This chapter reads the cases as a body and asks what they mean for the customer of a Singapore platform, for the platform's directors and for the Swiss creditor or Swiss group company caught in the proceedings.
The Swiss comparison runs through the chapter. Switzerland answered the customer-asset question by statute in 2021. Art. 242a DEBA gives the customer a right to the segregation of crypto assets that the bankrupt custodian held for him, provided they were either allocated individually or held collectively and readily attributable (see Part D, Chapter IV and Part H, Chapter VII). Singapore has no such provision. The customer's position depends on the terms of service, on the general law of trusts and, since 2023, on the segregation duties MAS imposes on licensed digital payment token service providers (see Part K, Chapter II). The Singapore cases therefore turned on contract interpretation in a way the Swiss cases do not.
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.