简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

India: Investment Corridors and GIFT City: practical consequences

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

Structuring an investment in India from Singapore

The Singapore route to India remains open to structures with substance. A Singapore holding company that merely holds shares and is managed from elsewhere is now exposed to the limitation of benefits, the principal purpose test, India’s general anti-avoidance rules and the scrutiny of the place of effective management. Grandfathered shares acquired before 1 April 2017 retain the residence-based exemption, but only if the holding company satisfies the expenditure test in both of the two years before the sale and survives an inquiry into its purpose, which the Tiger Global judgment has made more searching. New investments enjoy no capital gains advantage over direct investment from most other states. Their advantages lie in reduced withholding rates on dividends and interest, in the reliability of Singapore governance and dispute resolution, and in access to the Singapore financial services ecosystem.

Investors should also consider GIFT City as an alternative or a complement. A fund investing only in India, with Indian or diaspora investors, may find the tax regime of the centre attractive. A fund with a regional mandate and international institutional investors will usually prefer Singapore. Some managers combine both, with a Singapore master fund and a GIFT City vehicle for Indian investors.

Checklist for practitioners

  • Determine whether the Indian shares were acquired before 1 April 2017 and document the acquisition date for each block of shares.
  • Keep evidence that the Singapore company has spent at least S$200,000 on operations in Singapore in each of the twelve-month periods within the 24 months before an exit, preferably with a certificate from the auditors and a tax residency certificate from IRAS.
  • Hold board meetings and take investment decisions in Singapore, with directors who exercise real judgement, so that the place of effective management is not attributed to India or to a third country.
  • Record the commercial reasons for using a Singapore entity, such as a regional mandate, co-investors, financing or governance, in order to meet the principal purpose test.
  • Check the beneficial owners of the fund and its investors against India’s rules on investment from countries sharing a land border with India.
  • Assess whether the exit will be an indirect transfer of Indian assets and plan the withholding and reporting obligations of the buyer.
  • Compare the Singapore structure with a GIFT City vehicle, including the relocation regime for offshore funds and the stability of the tax concessions.
  • Provide for arbitration seated in Singapore or another neutral seat in shareholders’ agreements, and check enforceability in India.
  • Monitor Indian case law after the Tiger Global judgment, CBDT circulars, the provisions of the Income-tax Act 2025 and the review of the CECA, which may change the position of existing structures.

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. As a Singapore law practice, KGP Legal LLC is authorised under the Legal Profession Act 1966 to advise on Singapore law and to represent clients before the Singapore courts; foreign law practices with an office in Singapore are, as a rule, not permitted to do either. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.