A closing comparative note
The enforcement systems of the two hubs reflect the character of each legal order. Singapore concentrates investigation, prosecution and regulation in a few well-resourced agencies that move fast, publish routinely and expect cooperation. Switzerland distributes the functions across cantonal and federal prosecutors, FINMA, the SROs and the courts, with procedural guarantees at each step that slow the process and give the affected party more scope to resist. For a founder deciding where to place the regulated activity, the choice is between a system that will act quickly and publicly against a firm that fails and a system that will act slowly and with greater procedural protection. For a victim deciding where to seek recovery, the choice is easier. Singapore's civil courts and police will produce a freeze within days, whereas the Swiss system will produce one within months. The structures described in Part P are built to use each system for what it does well.
For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.