简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

How the ecosystem compares with Crypto Valley

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

The two ecosystems differ in origin and in texture. Crypto Valley grew from below. The Ethereum Foundation, Bitcoin Suisse and a dozen start-ups chose Zug in 2013 and 2014 for its tax climate and its tolerant officials, after which the cantonal government, the Crypto Valley Association and FINMA responded to what was already there. Singapore's ecosystem grew from above. MAS set the terms, licensed the firms, funded the pilots and admitted the banks, whereupon the start-ups arranged themselves around the regulator's programme. Crypto Valley is a cluster of protocol foundations, developers and venture funds with a small layer of licensed intermediaries on top. Singapore is a cluster of licensed intermediaries, banks and infrastructure with a small layer of protocol work beneath.

FeatureCrypto Valley (Zug)Singapore
OriginBottom-up, 2013–2017Top-down, 2016–2024
Dominant actorsProtocol foundations, developers, venture capitalLicensed exchanges, banks, MAS pilots
Licensed populationHundreds of SRO members, a dozen FINMA licenseesA few dozen DPT licensees, few CMS licensees
Banking accessSpecialist and cantonal banksDomestic banks for licensees
Retail tradingPermitted through licensed intermediariesPermitted with severe conduct restrictions
Tokenisation infrastructureSDX (single regulated ledger)Project Guardian, GL1 (interoperable networks)
Public fundingCantonal and federal support, modestMAS grants, pilots, Festival
Typical clientFounder, foundation, developerInstitution, family office, bank

Neither model is superior. A founder building a protocol needs Zug's tolerance and its foundation law. A manager launching a tokenised fund for Asian institutions needs Singapore's banks and its pilots. The practical question for a client is how to use both, which Part P answers.

Chapter V now turns to the regional competition, in which Hong Kong figures first.

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. As a Singapore law practice, KGP Legal LLC is authorised under the Legal Profession Act 1966 to advise on Singapore law and to represent clients before the Singapore courts; foreign law practices with an office in Singapore are, as a rule, not permitted to do either. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.