简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

How the Singapore and Swiss income tax treatments compare

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

The two hubs reach similar results for companies and different results for individuals. A Swiss AG and a Singapore Pte Ltd are both taxed on their trading profit from tokens, both may defer utility token revenue under accounting principles and both treat security token issuance as capital. The differences arise for individuals. Switzerland taxes staking, lending and airdrop income for every private holder and exempts private capital gains under Art. 16 para. 3 of the Direct Federal Tax Act with a safe harbour whose criteria are published. Singapore taxes nothing in the hands of a genuine investor and everything in the hands of a trader, with the line drawn by badges that are weighed case by case. Switzerland also imposes a wealth tax on token holdings at the year-end price and Singapore does not. For a founder who holds a large illiquid treasury allocation, the Swiss wealth tax may be the heaviest tax of all and the reason to prefer Singapore, as Part G, Chapter III explains and Part P, Chapter I quantifies.

ItemSingaporeSwitzerland (federal, with cantonal variations)
Private capital gain on tokensNot taxed if investorExempt (Art. 16 para. 3 DFTA) if private wealth
Trader status testBadges of trade, facts and circumstancesCircular 36 safe harbour, then overall assessment
Staking reward, private holderTreated as income by IRAS practiceIncome from movable property
Free airdropNot income on receiptIncome at receipt in most cantonal practice
Wealth taxNoneYes, year-end value
Mining by individualHobby unless systematicIncome if systematic; wealth tax on holdings
ICO proceeds: utility tokenDeferred revenueDeferred under Swiss GAAP, FTA working paper
ICO proceeds: payment tokenTaxable on issuanceTaxable, treatment debated
Capital loss reliefNoneNone for private wealth

The comparison is drawn further in Part O, Chapter I. The lesson for the practitioner is that a client's status as investor or trader is the single most valuable fact to establish in Singapore and the least predictable. Chapter II of this Part therefore devotes itself to that line and to the statutory qualifications that Parliament added in 2024.

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. As a Singapore law practice, KGP Legal LLC is authorised under the Legal Profession Act 1966 to advise on Singapore law and to represent clients before the Singapore courts; foreign law practices with an office in Singapore are, as a rule, not permitted to do either. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.