简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português

Procedure in practice

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

Timeline

A contested commercial claim in the General Division runs from filing to judgment in about twelve to eighteen months, with the single application pending trial heard within the first six months and trial dates fixed at the first case conference. Summary judgment, available where the defendant has no defence, can produce judgment within four to six months, which is the ByBit timeline. Interim relief is available within days. The SICC publishes target timelines and routinely completes cases within a year.

Evidence from the ledger

Singapore courts admit ledger data as documentary evidence under the Evidence Act 1893, with the attribution of addresses proved by the exchange disclosures, the parties' admissions or expert evidence. Hash values, block numbers and timestamps are treated as reliable once the ledger is identified. Screenshots of block explorers are admitted with a witness statement explaining how they were obtained. The presumption in s 116A of the Evidence Act that electronic records produced by a device in the ordinary course are accurate assists, although it is rebuttable.1 Smart-contract code is proved by expert evidence of what the deployed bytecode does, with the verified source code on a block explorer as the usual starting point.

Interim measures in support of foreign proceedings

Since 2016 the Singapore court may grant interim relief in aid of foreign court proceedings under s 4(10A) of the Civil Law Act, provided the foreign proceedings are capable of giving rise to a judgment enforceable in Singapore. A Swiss claimant with proceedings in Zürich against a defendant who holds tokens at a Singapore exchange may therefore obtain a Singapore freezing order and disclosure against the exchange in support of the Swiss case, without suing in Singapore on the merits.2 This provision, which has no Swiss counterpart, is the most useful tool in the book for a Swiss litigator with a Singapore asset problem.

Notes

  1. Evidence Act 1893, s 116A (presumptions in relation to electronic records), Singapore Statutes Online. ↩
  2. Civil Law Act 1909, s 4(10A), inserted by the Civil Law (Amendment) Act 2016, Singapore Statutes Online. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For Hong Kong, our parallel site HongkongIQ.com offers the same practical guidance. For crypto and digital assets, dltreg.com covers legal, tax and fiduciary services. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.