简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português

Self-custody

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

Self-custody means the holder controls the private key without an intermediary. The key may sit in software on a phone or laptop (a hot wallet), on a dedicated hardware device that signs transactions without exposing the key (a hardware wallet), or on paper or metal (a cold wallet). The term "wallet" misleads. Nothing is stored in a wallet. The tokens are on the ledger and the wallet holds only the key that controls them.

The legal position of the self-custodian is simple and harsh. She has full factual power of disposal and no counterparty. No one owes her anything. If she loses the key, the tokens are lost to everyone. If she is defrauded into signing a transaction, the transfer is final and her remedy lies against the fraudster alone. Both Swiss and Singapore courts have been asked to help victims of such frauds and have developed proprietary and disclosure remedies against exchanges that later receive the tokens, but neither system can reverse a transfer on the chain.1

Self-custody is outside the regulatory perimeter in both hubs. A person who holds her own tokens needs no licence anywhere. A software developer who publishes a wallet application that never holds keys is likewise outside the perimeter, although FINMA has indicated that a wallet provider who can initiate transfers on behalf of a user, or who holds a share of a multi-signature key, may become a financial intermediary under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA; GwG).2 Singapore excludes from the custody service any arrangement in which the provider "does not have possession or control" of the tokens, which it reads as meaning the ability to move them without the customer's cooperation.

Notes

  1. For Singapore, CLM v CLN [2022] SGHC 46 (proprietary injunction and disclosure orders against exchanges holding stolen Bitcoin and Ether); for Switzerland, the attachment and provisional-measure tools in Part H, Chapter V. ↩
  2. FINMA, Guidelines for enquiries regarding the regulatory framework for initial coin offerings (ICOs), 16 February 2018, section 3.3; FINMA Guidance 02/2019 of 26 August 2019, section 3 on wallet providers with power of disposal. See Part F, Chapter II. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For Hong Kong, our parallel site HongkongIQ.com offers the same practical guidance. For crypto and digital assets, dltreg.com covers legal, tax and fiduciary services. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.