简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português

Switzerland

Read the PDF edition (2 pages)

Case or decisionCitationCourt or authorityProposition
FINMA v QUID PRO QUO Association (E-Coin)FINMA ruling and press release of 19 September 2017FINMAIssuing a "coin" against payment with a promise of redemption is unauthorised deposit-taking; liquidation of the issuers.
FINMA v Envion AGFINMA ruling of March 2019; press release of 27 March 2019FINMAAn ICO of about CHF 100 million raised deposits from the public without a licence; liquidation ordered; founders named.
Envion AG (appeal)Federal Administrative Court, B-decision (2019–2021)Federal Administrative CourtConfirmation of FINMA's qualification of the ICO proceeds as public deposits.
FlowBank SAFINMA rulings of 8 March 2024 (licence withdrawal) and 13 June 2024 (bankruptcy)FINMABankruptcy of a bank with crypto custody business; custody assets segregated under Art. 16 and 37d BankA; depositors repaid ahead of the estate.
Reporting threshold under Art. 9 AMLABGE 147 IV 274Federal Supreme CourtA financial intermediary's duty to report arises on a simple suspicion that cannot be dispelled by clarification; failure to report is punishable under Art. 37 AMLA.
Money laundering: obstruction of confiscationBGE 119 IV 242Federal Supreme CourtAny act apt to frustrate the tracing, seizure or confiscation of criminally derived assets is laundering under Art. 305bis SCC.
Money laundering by omissionBGE 136 IV 188Federal Supreme CourtA financial intermediary who fails to report or freeze can commit laundering by omission where a legal duty to act exists.
Private capital gains and professional tradingBGE 125 II 113; BGer 2C_868/2008Federal Supreme CourtCriteria distinguishing tax-free private asset management from self-employed securities trading, applied by the FTA to crypto assets.
Good faith acquisition of movablesBGE 122 III 1Federal Supreme CourtScope of Art. 933 ff. CC; the doctrine does not reach tokens because they are not things.
Trust recognition under the Hague ConventionBGE 135 III 614Federal Supreme CourtEffects of a recognised foreign trust on Swiss attachment and enforcement.

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For Hong Kong, our parallel site HongkongIQ.com offers the same practical guidance. For crypto and digital assets, dltreg.com covers legal, tax and fiduciary services. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.