简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

Staking, Lending and Yield in Singapore: the Swiss comparison

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

Switzerland reached a different equilibrium through its banking law. FINMA's Guidance 08/2023 on staking distinguishes between staking in which the custodian keeps the tokens available to the customer at all times and staking in which the tokens are locked. It treats the former as compatible with custody segregation under Art. 16 BankA while flagging the latter as a potential deposit (see Part E, Chapter VIII). The result is that Swiss banks and SRO-affiliated custodians offer staking to retail customers within defined parameters. The customer's protection comes from the segregation rules of the Banking Act and Art. 242a DEBA. Lending platforms that take tokens for their own account are deposit-takers and need a banking or fintech licence, which has kept the Hodlnaut model out of Switzerland.

The two systems protect the customer by different means. Switzerland regulates the provider's balance sheet: if the tokens are the provider's, it is a bank. Singapore regulates the customer's access: if the customer is retail, the product does not exist. For a group operating in both hubs, the practical division is that retail yield products belong in the Swiss entity under its banking or SRO status, while the Singapore entity offers staking only to professional clients. A founder whose business is retail yield belongs in Zug and should expect FINMA's deposit analysis to determine the licence.

QuestionSwitzerlandSingapore
Retail custodial stakingPermitted within FINMA Guidance 08/2023 parametersProhibited for DPT licensees
Retail token lending to providerDeposit-taking; banking or fintech licence requiredProhibited for DPT licensees; debenture analysis for others
Institutional stakingPermitted; segregation under Art. 16 BankAPermitted; custodial wallet service; trust
Pooled yield productCollective investment under CISA or structured productCIS under SFA; restricted to accredited investors
Protection mechanismSegregation in insolvency (Art. 242a DEBA; Art. 16 BankA)Statutory trust for licensees; retail exclusion

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. As a Singapore law practice, KGP Legal LLC is authorised under the Legal Profession Act 1966 to advise on Singapore law and to represent clients before the Singapore courts; foreign law practices with an office in Singapore are, as a rule, not permitted to do either. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.