简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

Vicarious liability and employee fraud

Read the PDF edition (1 page)

An employer is vicariously liable for the torts of an employee committed in the course of employment, including fraud, where the wrongful act is so closely connected with the employment that it is fair and just to hold the employer liable.1 ByBit was a case of an employee of a payroll contractor defrauding the exchange itself, so vicarious liability did not arise. The converse case, where a platform's employee diverts customer assets, is the more frequent one. A platform whose employee used her authorised access to the withdrawal system to steal from customers is likely to be vicariously liable. The access was conferred by the employment, and the theft was a misuse of the very function she was employed to perform. The platform's recourse is against the employee and against any insurer. Platforms should know that fidelity cover for crypto theft is expensive and narrowly drawn.

Notes

  1. Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (Publ), Singapore Branch v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2011] SGCA 22 at [75]–[93], adopting the close-connection test for vicarious liability in Singapore. ↩

For general information only. This article does not constitute legal or tax advice, does not replace advice on an individual case and creates no lawyer-client relationship. It reflects the legal position as of October 2026.

Setting up or expanding in Singapore?

SingaporeIQ is edited by Dr Alexander Ressos, an international business lawyer with more than 15 years of local experience in Singapore as a permanent resident, a Singapore registered foreign lawyer and managing partner of a Singapore foreign law practice. In addition to significant experience in cross-border investments and transactions, UHNWI private client work and sanctions/export controls, Dr Ressos has extensive experience in cross-border business and in crypto and digital-asset projects in Singapore, drawn from more than 700 projects since 2017.

If you are planning a company incorporation, an investment, a holding structure or a market entry through Singapore, you can reach Dr Ressos directly at [email protected]. Singapore law advice is provided by KGP Legal LLC, a licensed firm of Singapore advocates and solicitors. As a Singapore law practice, KGP Legal LLC is authorised under the Legal Profession Act 1966 to advise on Singapore law and to represent clients before the Singapore courts; foreign law practices with an office in Singapore are, as a rule, not permitted to do either. Dr Ressos and his team facilitate the full range of Singapore legal, compliance and company administration services, including company incorporation, corporate transactions, commercial contracts, crypto and digital assets, financial regulatory work and dispute resolution, including litigation in the Singapore courts. For legal, tax and fiduciary services in Switzerland, see helveticaregister.com.