简体 繁體 日本語 한국어 English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português Русский Українська

Digital Assets: Singapore IV: AML/CFT and Compliance

Digital Assets: Singapore IV: AML/CFT and Compliance

Singapore IV: AML/CFT and Compliance — a part of the book Digital Assets Law in Singapore and Switzerland by Dr Alexander Ressos.

Singapore IV: AML/CFT and Compliance

Singapore IV: AML/CFT and Compliance: a part of the book Digital Assets Law in Singapore and Switzerland by Dr Alexander Ressos.

About the book

This part belongs to Digital Assets Law in Singapore and Switzerland by Dr Alexander Ressos, published here in full, section by section.

Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Singapore IV: AML/CFT and Compliance

Anti-money-laundering law is the part of Singapore's digital-asset regime that decides whether a business survives contact with its own customers. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Three statutes and one regulator

Singapore's AML/CFT regime rests on three statutes, each of which does a different job. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The MAS notices: PSN01, PSN02 and the DTSP notice

The operational AML/CFT duties of a DPT business are set out in MAS notices issued under the PSA. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The FATF layer

Singapore has been a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) since 1992 and held the FATF Presidency from July 2022 to June 2024 through T. Raja Kumar. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The national risk assessment and the sector risk of digital assets

Singapore published its first money-laundering national risk assessment in January 2014 and its first terrorism-financing assessment in 2020. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Reading the regime as a whole

The compliance officer of a Singapore DPT firm works with five layers at once. The criminal statutes set the offences and the personal exposure. The MAS notice sets the duties. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The structure of PSN02

MAS Notice PSN02 is organised in the same sequence as every other MAS AML/CFT notice, from the Banking Act notice (MAS Notice 626) to the notices for capital markets intermediaries, trust companies… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The enterprise-wide risk assessment

Before any customer is onboarded, PSN02 requires the firm to identify and assess the money-laundering and terrorism-financing risks it faces across customers, countries, products, services,… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Standard CDD: identification, verification and purpose

The core of PSN02 is the duty to identify the customer, to verify that identity using reliable and independent sources and to identify and take reasonable measures to verify the beneficial owner. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Simplified CDD

PSN02 allows simplified CDD where the firm has assessed the risk of a customer, product or transaction as low, provided the assessment is documented and consistent with the enterprise-wide risk… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Enhanced CDD

Enhanced CDD is mandatory for three categories and discretionary for a fourth. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Screening

PSN02 requires the firm to screen customers, natural persons appointed to act, connected parties and beneficial owners against relevant lists at onboarding, on a periodic basis and when lists are… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Ongoing monitoring

CDD is not complete at onboarding. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Reliance on third parties

PSN02 permits a firm to rely on a third party to perform the identification, verification and purpose elements of CDD. Three conditions apply. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Record-keeping and personal data

Records of CDD, account files, business correspondence and transaction data must be kept for at least five years after the end of the business relationship or the completion of the occasional… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Origin and purpose

The travel rule is the requirement that information about the originator and the beneficiary of a transfer accompany the transfer itself, so that each institution in the chain and any investigator… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The Singapore rule: PSN02 on value transfers

PSN02 applies the value-transfer requirements to every DPT transfer that a licensee makes or receives on behalf of a customer, whatever the amount. The information set depends on value. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Unhosted wallets

The hardest case is the transfer to or from a wallet whose keys are held by a private person without any institution behind it. The FATF calls these "unhosted" or "self-hosted" wallets. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Counterparty due diligence

The travel rule only works if the firm knows which institution stands behind the beneficiary address. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The sunrise problem

The FATF borrowed the "sunrise" image to describe the period during which the travel rule has dawned in some jurisdictions and not in others. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Incomplete and non-compliant transfers

A Singapore licensee that receives a DPT transfer lacking the required information has three lawful responses: execute and follow up, suspend pending information, or reject and return. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Data protection in the travel rule

Transmitting a customer's name, address and identification number to a foreign institution is a cross-border transfer of personal data. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Where the rule is heading

Three developments were visible at the state-of-law date. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The statutory duty

The duty to report sits in s. 45 of the CDSA and binds every person in Singapore, whether or not they are regulated. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The PSN02 overlay

For a DPT licensee the statutory duty is supplemented by PSN02. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Forming the suspicion: the DPT typologies

What makes a DPT transaction suspicious? Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Timing and quality of the report

The statute says "as soon as is reasonably practicable". Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

After the report

Filing an STR does not end the firm's obligations or its exposure. Four questions arise. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The lawyer's position

Lawyers in Singapore are not exempt from s. 45. The duty applies to knowledge acquired in the course of a profession, of which the profession of law is no exception. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Reporting in the group

Where a Singapore DPT licensee is part of a group, the firm must decide how much of an STR may be shared with affiliates. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Why one case has its own chapter

On 15 August 2023 some four hundred officers of the Singapore Police Force conducted simultaneous raids across the island and arrested ten foreign nationals on charges of money laundering, forgery… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The facts

The ten accused, nine men and one woman, were born in Fujian province in China and had acquired the citizenship of other countries, among them Cambodia, Cyprus, Vanuatu, Turkey, Dominica and Saint… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

What went wrong

The Inter-Ministerial Committee established in October 2023 to review the case published its report on 4 October 2024. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The policy response

The response came in four waves between late 2023 and mid-2025. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The crypto dimension

The case was not a crypto case in the sense that the public assets were mostly real estate and bank balances. Its lessons for the digital-asset sector are nonetheless direct. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

What a DPT licensee should take from the case

The committee's report and the 2025 penalties define the standard that MAS now applies to every supervised institution, including DPT licensees. Six points translate directly. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The case in comparative light

Switzerland has had its own formative cases, from the Abacha and Montesinos funds to 1MDB and Petrobras, and has reacted in each instance with a tightening of due-diligence rules, the most recent… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Singapore's approach to sanctions

Singapore's sanctions policy differs from Switzerland's in a way that a dual-hub compliance programme must take into account from the first day. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

United Nations sanctions: the legal mechanism

The United Nations Act 2001 empowers the Minister to make regulations to give effect to decisions of the United Nations Security Council under Article 41 of the Charter. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The Russia measures of March 2022

On 5 March 2022 Singapore announced sanctions against Russia in response to the invasion of Ukraine, acting for the first time in decades without a Security Council mandate. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

OFAC and the commercial reality

No Singapore law requires a Singapore DPT licensee to comply with United States sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Screening practice for a DPT licensee

Sanctions screening at a DPT licensee has three components that a fiat institution's screening lacks or has in simpler form. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Proliferation financing

The FATF added a proliferation-financing risk-assessment requirement to Recommendation 1 in October 2020. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Sanctions and the lawyer

A lawyer advising a DPT licensee on sanctions in Singapore must hold three jurisdictions in view at once. The Singapore layer determines what is unlawful and what must be frozen and reported. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The governance that MAS expects

PSN02 closes with the requirements that make everything before it work: internal policies, procedures and controls approved by senior management, a compliance function with adequate resources and… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The compliance officer

PSN02 requires the appointment of an AML/CFT compliance officer at management level, with sufficient resources, independence and access to information to perform the role. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Technology risk and cyber hygiene

A DPT licensee's AML/CFT controls run on technology, and MAS regulates that technology through two notices and one set of guidelines that are in practice inseparable from the AML programme. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Outsourcing and third-party risk

Most DPT licensees outsource core parts of their compliance stack: identity verification, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring, blockchain analytics and travel-rule messaging are all… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Independent audit

PSN02 requires an independent audit function to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the AML/CFT programme regularly. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

MAS inspections

MAS supervises DPT licensees through off-site monitoring of returns and STR copies, through thematic reviews across groups of licensees and through on-site inspections of individual firms. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Enforcement against DPT licensees

MAS's enforcement toolkit under the PSA and the FSMA comprises supervisory directions, licence conditions, composition of offences and reprimands. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Training, screening of staff and culture

PSN02 requires the firm to screen employees for integrity before hiring and to train them on AML/CFT at induction and regularly thereafter, with content tailored to their roles. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The problem stated

The typical client of a Swiss–Singapore digital-asset practice is a group. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The legal basis for a group programme

Both regimes require or assume a group-wide approach, but with different reach. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Where the regimes diverge

The following table sets out the points at which a group cannot apply one rule to both entities without choosing. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Reliance between the entities

The most common operational question is whether one entity may rely on the CDD performed by the other, so that a customer onboarded in Zug can open an account in Singapore without repeating the… Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Which entity serves which customer

Reliance solves the onboarding question but not the structural one: which entity should have the customer relationship at all? Three rules of thumb have emerged. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

Information sharing and its limits

A group programme depends on the two entities knowing what each other knows about shared customers. Four legal constraints shape what may be shared. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

A model group protocol

The following elements constitute a group AML protocol that in my experience satisfies both regulators. Read more
Singapore · AML and Sanctions

The position of a Swiss SRO member with a Singapore MPI: three recurring questions

Three questions arise so often in this configuration that they deserve direct answers. Read more